All is not lost: Post-saccadic contributions to the perceptual omission of intra-saccadic streaks

Abstract

Saccades rapidly jerk the eye into new positions, yet we rarely experience the motion streaks imposed on the retinal image. Here we examined spatial and temporal properties of post-saccadic masking—one potential explanation of this perceptual omission. Observers judged the motion direction of a target stimulus, a Gaussian blob, that moved vertically upwards or downwards and then back to its initial position, just as observers made a saccade. We manipulated the onset and offset of the target and of distractors in various spatial relations to the target, and assessed their effect on performance and subjective confidence. Although the presence of the target after the saccade caused the strongest omission, the offset of spatially distant distractor stimuli upon saccade offset also impaired performance. The temporal properties of these two separate effects suggest that, in addition to masking, an independent effect of attentional distraction further accentuates perceptual omission of intra-saccadic motion streaks.

Publication
In Consciousness and Cognition

When objects rapidly shift across the retina during saccades, they produce so-called motion streaks – elongated traces of the stimulus trajectory. During natural vision, however, we rarely notice this type of smearing. Previous studies have shown that the mere presence of stimulus after the saccade can achieve this ‘saccadic omission’. Tarryn’s study investigates not only the time course of this process but also the unexpected role of distractor stimuli. She has written a nice piece on her work for Science Trends.

Richard Schweitzer
Richard Schweitzer
Postdoc in Vision Science

Passionate about psychophysics, eye tracking, M/EEG, and computational modeling.